In his home state Chicago, former President Barack Obama has made a dramatic political speech in which he discusses the state of democracy in the United States, Donald Trump and the direction the Republican party has taken. He also discusses the importance of the mid-term elections this November and the need for people to vote. This speech is significant as President Obama had wished to follow the example of his predecessor, George W. Bush, and remain out of the political limelight once he left office. He has largely done this until today with this speech which he clearly felt needed to be made in light of the situation with President Trump, the scandals around his presidency, and the lack of response by the Republicans and Congress in general.
Below is the essay that has been generating huge discussion, controversy and anger after The New York Times decided to publish it. It is an anonymous account of inside the White House of Donald Trump written by what the NYT describes as “a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us.” The op-ed has added to the media sensation that has been created by the imminent publication of Bob Woodward’s book Fear: Trump In The White House, in which the veteran Washington Post reporter records accounts given to him by dozen of current and ex-White House staffers about Donald Trump and his presidency. Mr Woodward, along with fellow Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein were in 1972 pivotal, through their reporting of the criminal activities of President Richard Nixon, in the eventual resignation and disgrace of the President. Mr Woodward is perhaps one of America’s most respected and consistent journalists and, apart from Donald Trump and some in his administration, most people have given his accounts in his new book the benefit of the doubt as being accurate.
Debate is raging as who wrote The New York Times op-ed, and it seems likely that the author’s name will emerge eventually. Many are regarding the op-ed as unprecedented, not least because it is anonymous, but also that it is written in real-time so to speak. Previous revelations about life inside the White House, such as during the Johnson and Nixon administrations were written after their presidencies had ended. This, however, is very much in the present and many are seeing it as a warning of the dangers being posed by the President and his behaviour. One commentator said that it was a “primal scream to the Republican party” for help – help which so far has been unforthcoming in large.
Source of this op-ed: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html
I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration
I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
Sept. 5, 2018
The Times is taking the rare step of publishing an anonymous Op-Ed essay. We have done so at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers. We invite you to submit a question about the essay or our vetting process here.
President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.
It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall.
The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
I would know. I am one of them.
To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.
But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.
That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.
The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.
Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright.
In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.
Don’t get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more.
But these successes have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.
From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to insulate their operations from his whims.
Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.
“There is literally no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,” a top official complained to me recently, exasperated by an Oval Office meeting at which the president flip-flopped on a major policy decision he’d made only a week earlier.
The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful.
It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.
The result is a two-track presidency.
Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us to allied, like-minded nations.
Astute observers have noted, though, that the rest of the administration is operating on another track, one where countries like Russia are called out for meddling and punished accordingly, and where allies around the world are engaged as peers rather than ridiculed as rivals.
On Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior. But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable.
This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.
Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.
The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility.
Senator John McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap, with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.
We may no longer have Senator McCain. But we will always have his example — a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue. Mr. Trump may fear such honorable men, but we should revere them.
There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single one: Americans.
The writer is a senior official in the Trump administration.
REACTIONS TO THIS OP-ED
- Trump Lashes Out After Reports of ‘Quiet Resistance’ by Staff – Sept. 5, 2018
- Anonymous Op-Ed in New York Times Causes a Stir Online and in the White House – Sept. 5, 2018
- It Wasn’t Me: Pence, Pompeo, Mattis and Mnuchin Deny Writing Anonymous Op-Ed – Sept. 6, 2018
- ‘Anonymous’ vs. Trump: Resistance From Within – Sept. 6, 2018